{"favorites":{},"caseDigest":{"id":17363,"deleted":false,"created_at":"2013-05-21T16:40:41.056-06:00","updated_at":"2019-03-24T23:38:21.611-06:00","last_published_at":"2016-12-13T19:17:15.324-07:00","is_digested":false,"pdf":"feather_river_anesthesia_med._grp.__inc._v._fremont_rideout_health_grp.20181205-38958-6167nj.pdf","published_revision":{"id":43453,"name":"Feather River Anesthesia Med. Grp., Inc. v. Fremont-Rideout Health Grp.","full_text":"

The editors have not yet created a digest for this case.

","cite":"2004 WL 1468741 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)","judge":"Nicholson, George W.","decision_date":"2004-06-30T00:00:00.000-06:00","case_digest_id":17363,"published":true,"created_at":"2016-01-15T10:05:19.167-07:00","updated_at":"2017-04-25T21:57:11.133-06:00","judge_type":"Appellate Court Judge","court_id":2001,"key_case":false,"non_subscription":false,"internal_notes":"Unpublished/noncitable","sign_off":null,"notes":"Unpublished/noncitable","google_scholar_link":"","opinion":{"url":null},"opinion_cache":null,"in_dropbox":false,"cached_tag_list":"Sanctions, Costs and Fees, Failure to Produce","no_link_found":true,"autolinked_full_text":"

The editors have not yet created a digest for this case.

","last_reviewed_on":"2016-01-05","qc_complete":false,"linked_federal_rules":"","tag_overturn":false,"rule_overturn":false,"unpublished":true,"needs_update":null,"google_scholar_text":null,"full_text_verified":null,"google_scholar_text_type":null,"full_case_visibility":false,"modal_ready":false,"formatting_errors":false,"style_errors":null,"opinion_pdf_attached":false,"display_opinion_file":false,"court_display_name":null,"parsed_attributes":null,"full_name":null,"mdl":null,"parser_qc_complete":false,"parser_issue_type":null,"use_eda_format":false,"case_title":null,"docket_number":null,"counsel":null,"decision_title":null,"body_text":null,"additional_dates":[],"decision_date_label":"","has_tables":false,"has_table_of_contents":false,"disposition":null,"image_display_errors":false,"de_updated_at":null,"de_updated_by_id":null,"ready_for_review":false,"de_further_review":false,"appellate_case":false,"de_further_review_notes":null,"appellate_info":null,"tag_list":["Sanctions","Costs and Fees","Failure to Produce"]},"state_rules":[],"federal_rules":[],"district_rules":[]},"scholarText":"

","relatedCases":[{"id":29921,"deleted":false,"created_at":"2020-09-15T13:07:20.281-06:00","updated_at":"2020-09-25T10:09:23.064-06:00","last_published_at":"2020-09-25T10:09:20.729-06:00","is_digested":false,"pdf":"asamoah_v._capstone_logistics__llc20200925-4-jdpu8w.pdf","slug":"29921-asamoah-v-capstone-logistics-llc","published_revision":{"id":86170,"name":"Asamoah v. Capstone Logistics, LLC","cite":"2020 WL 5505183 (S.D. Ohio 2020)","judge":"Jolson, Kimberly A.","decision_date":"2020-09-11T00:00:00.000-06:00","case_digest_id":29921,"published":true,"created_at":"2020-09-15T13:07:20.290-06:00","updated_at":"2020-09-25T10:09:20.449-06:00","judge_type":"United States Magistrate Judge","court_id":2241,"key_case":false,"non_subscription":false,"internal_notes":null,"sign_off":null,"notes":null,"google_scholar_link":null,"opinion":{"url":null},"opinion_cache":null,"in_dropbox":false,"cached_tag_list":"Dismissal, Cooperation of counsel, Failure to Produce, Costs and Fees, Sanctions, Proportionality, Bad Faith","no_link_found":false,"last_reviewed_on":null,"qc_complete":false,"linked_federal_rules":"Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 -- effective 12/1/15","tag_overturn":false,"rule_overturn":false,"unpublished":false,"needs_update":null,"full_text_verified":null,"google_scholar_text_type":"westlaw","full_case_visibility":null,"modal_ready":true,"formatting_errors":false,"style_errors":null,"opinion_pdf_attached":false,"display_opinion_file":false,"court_display_name":"United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division","parsed_attributes":null,"full_name":null,"mdl":null,"parser_qc_complete":false,"parser_issue_type":null,"use_eda_format":true,"case_title":"Michael ASAMOAH, Plaintiff, v. CAPSTONE LOGISTICS, LLC, et al., Defendants. Michael Asamoah, Plaintiff, v. The Sygma Network, Inc., Defendant","docket_number":"Civil Action 2:19-cv-5292, Civil Action 2:19-cv-5507","counsel":"Michael Asamoah, Columbus, OH, pro se. Oliver D. Frey, Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease LLP, Samuel Neal Lillard, Fisher & Phillips, LLC, Columbus, OH, Michael Arthur Correll, Pro Hac Vice, Reed Smith LLP, Dallas, TX, Paul Michael Knettel, Pro Hac Vice, Peter Justin Stuhldreher, Pro Hac Vice, Reed Smith LLP, Houston, TX, for Defendant.","decision_title":"ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION","additional_dates":[],"decision_date_label":"Signed","has_tables":false,"has_table_of_contents":false,"disposition":"Motion to Compel, Motion for Sanctions","image_display_errors":false,"de_updated_at":null,"de_updated_by_id":null,"ready_for_review":false,"de_further_review":false,"appellate_case":false,"de_further_review_notes":"","appellate_info":"","tag_list":["Dismissal","Cooperation of counsel","Failure to Produce","Costs and Fees","Sanctions","Proportionality","Bad Faith"]}},{"id":29922,"deleted":false,"created_at":"2020-09-15T13:11:15.480-06:00","updated_at":"2020-09-25T10:06:44.840-06:00","last_published_at":"2020-09-25T10:06:40.873-06:00","is_digested":false,"pdf":"garrison_v._ringgold20200925-4-b4ksl1.pdf","slug":"29922-garrison-v-ringgold","published_revision":{"id":86171,"name":"Garrison v. Ringgold","cite":"2020 WL 5511978 (S.D. Cal. 2020)","judge":"Butcher, Daniel E.","decision_date":"2020-09-11T00:00:00.000-06:00","case_digest_id":29922,"published":true,"created_at":"2020-09-15T13:11:15.489-06:00","updated_at":"2020-09-25T10:06:40.528-06:00","judge_type":"United States Magistrate Judge","court_id":2105,"key_case":false,"non_subscription":false,"internal_notes":null,"sign_off":null,"notes":null,"google_scholar_link":null,"opinion":{"url":null},"opinion_cache":null,"in_dropbox":false,"cached_tag_list":"Dismissal, Exclusion of Pleading, Default Judgment, Text Messages, Failure to Preserve, Spoliation, Failure to Produce, Costs and Fees, Sanctions","no_link_found":false,"last_reviewed_on":null,"qc_complete":false,"linked_federal_rules":"Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 -- effective 12/1/15","tag_overturn":false,"rule_overturn":false,"unpublished":false,"needs_update":null,"full_text_verified":null,"google_scholar_text_type":"westlaw","full_case_visibility":null,"modal_ready":true,"formatting_errors":false,"style_errors":null,"opinion_pdf_attached":false,"display_opinion_file":false,"court_display_name":"United States District Court, S.D. California","parsed_attributes":null,"full_name":null,"mdl":null,"parser_qc_complete":false,"parser_issue_type":null,"use_eda_format":true,"case_title":"TOMMY GARRISON, an individual; and CHRISTINE GARRISON, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. REGINALD BUDDY RINGGOLD, III aka Rasool Abdul Rahim El, an individual; ROSEGOLD INVESTMENTS, LLP, a Delaware partnership; and MASTER INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., a California corporation, Defendants","docket_number":"Case No.: 19-cv-0244-GPC (DEB)","counsel":"William Richard Restis, The Restis Law Firm, P.C., San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs. Reginald Buddy Ringgold, III, San Diego, CA, pro se","decision_title":"REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS [DKT. NO. 57]","additional_dates":[],"decision_date_label":"Signed","has_tables":false,"has_table_of_contents":false,"disposition":"Motion to Terminate Sanctions","image_display_errors":false,"de_updated_at":null,"de_updated_by_id":null,"ready_for_review":false,"de_further_review":false,"appellate_case":false,"de_further_review_notes":"","appellate_info":"","tag_list":["Dismissal","Exclusion of Pleading","Default Judgment","Text Messages","Failure to Preserve","Spoliation","Failure to Produce","Costs and Fees","Sanctions"]}},{"id":29936,"deleted":false,"created_at":"2020-09-15T15:20:03.805-06:00","updated_at":"2020-09-16T10:05:17.713-06:00","last_published_at":"2020-09-16T10:05:07.789-06:00","is_digested":false,"pdf":"travelers_idem._co._v._trumpet__inc.20200916-4-jkfs4l.pdf","slug":"29936-travelers-idem-co-v-trumpet-inc","published_revision":{"id":86185,"name":"Travelers Idem. Co. v. Trumpet, Inc.","cite":"2020 WL 5372108 (C.D. Cal. 2020)","judge":"Early, John D.","decision_date":"2020-05-08T00:00:00.000-06:00","case_digest_id":29936,"published":true,"created_at":"2020-09-15T15:20:03.820-06:00","updated_at":"2020-09-16T10:05:07.215-06:00","judge_type":"United States Magistrate Judge","court_id":2102,"key_case":false,"non_subscription":false,"internal_notes":null,"sign_off":null,"notes":null,"google_scholar_link":null,"opinion":{"url":null},"opinion_cache":null,"in_dropbox":false,"cached_tag_list":"Attorney-Client Privilege, Custody or Control, Attorney Work-Product, Proportionality, Failure to Produce, Sanctions, Costs and Fees","no_link_found":false,"last_reviewed_on":null,"qc_complete":false,"linked_federal_rules":"Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, Fed. R. Civ. P. 33, Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 -- effective 12/1/15","tag_overturn":false,"rule_overturn":false,"unpublished":false,"needs_update":null,"full_text_verified":null,"google_scholar_text_type":"westlaw","full_case_visibility":null,"modal_ready":true,"formatting_errors":false,"style_errors":null,"opinion_pdf_attached":false,"display_opinion_file":false,"court_display_name":"United States District Court, C.D. California","parsed_attributes":null,"full_name":null,"mdl":null,"parser_qc_complete":false,"parser_issue_type":null,"use_eda_format":true,"case_title":"The Travelers Indemnity Company v. Trumpet, Inc.","docket_number":"Case No. 8:19-cv-01036-PSG (JDEx)","counsel":"Maria Barr, Deputy Clerk, Present for Plaintiff(s): n/a n/a, Court Reporter / Recorder, Attorneys Present for Defendant(s): n/a","decision_title":"Proceedings: (In Chambers): Order re Motion to Compel (Dkt. 36)","additional_dates":[],"decision_date_label":"Filed","has_tables":false,"has_table_of_contents":false,"disposition":"Motion to Compel","image_display_errors":false,"de_updated_at":null,"de_updated_by_id":null,"ready_for_review":false,"de_further_review":false,"appellate_case":false,"de_further_review_notes":"","appellate_info":"","tag_list":["Attorney-Client Privilege","Custody or Control","Attorney Work-Product","Proportionality","Failure to Produce","Sanctions","Costs and Fees"]}},{"id":29937,"deleted":false,"created_at":"2020-09-15T15:21:50.336-06:00","updated_at":"2020-09-16T09:37:18.260-06:00","last_published_at":"2020-09-16T09:37:16.341-06:00","is_digested":false,"pdf":"castle_v._lugo20200916-4-1fvja45.pdf","slug":"29937-castle-v-lugo","published_revision":{"id":86186,"name":"Castle v. Lugo","cite":"2020 WL 5353981 (C.D. Cal. 2020)","judge":"Early, John D.","decision_date":"2020-07-13T00:00:00.000-06:00","case_digest_id":29937,"published":true,"created_at":"2020-09-15T15:21:50.341-06:00","updated_at":"2020-09-16T09:37:16.103-06:00","judge_type":"United States Magistrate Judge","court_id":2102,"key_case":false,"non_subscription":false,"internal_notes":null,"sign_off":null,"notes":null,"google_scholar_link":null,"opinion":{"url":null},"opinion_cache":null,"in_dropbox":false,"cached_tag_list":"Proportionality, Failure to Produce, Sanctions, Costs and Fees","no_link_found":false,"last_reviewed_on":null,"qc_complete":false,"linked_federal_rules":"Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 -- effective 12/1/15","tag_overturn":false,"rule_overturn":false,"unpublished":false,"needs_update":null,"full_text_verified":null,"google_scholar_text_type":"westlaw","full_case_visibility":null,"modal_ready":true,"formatting_errors":false,"style_errors":null,"opinion_pdf_attached":false,"display_opinion_file":false,"court_display_name":"United States District Court, C.D. California","parsed_attributes":null,"full_name":null,"mdl":null,"parser_qc_complete":false,"parser_issue_type":null,"use_eda_format":true,"case_title":"Sylee Castle v. A. Lugo and C. Wood","docket_number":"Case No. 2:18-cv-08827-JVS (JDE)","counsel":"Sylee Castle, Lancaster, CA, pro se. Audra C. Call, Colin A. Shaff, CAAG - Office of Attorney General California Department of Justice, Los Angeles, CA, for A. Lugo and C. Wood","decision_title":"Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order re Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Dkt. 88)","additional_dates":[],"decision_date_label":"Filed","has_tables":false,"has_table_of_contents":false,"disposition":"Motion to Compel","image_display_errors":false,"de_updated_at":null,"de_updated_by_id":null,"ready_for_review":false,"de_further_review":false,"appellate_case":false,"de_further_review_notes":"","appellate_info":"","tag_list":["Proportionality","Failure to Produce","Sanctions","Costs and Fees"]}},{"id":29952,"deleted":false,"created_at":"2020-09-16T11:35:07.345-06:00","updated_at":"2020-09-16T11:45:25.709-06:00","last_published_at":"2020-09-16T11:45:22.133-06:00","is_digested":false,"pdf":"pure_circle_usa__inc._v._swee_gen__inc.20200916-4-10oz2dy.pdf","slug":"29952-purecircle-usa-inc-v-sweegen-inc","published_revision":{"id":86207,"name":"PureCircle USA, Inc. v. SweeGen, Inc.","cite":"2020 WL 5260491 (C.D. Cal. 2020)","judge":"Early, John D.","decision_date":"2020-07-20T00:00:00.000-06:00","case_digest_id":29952,"published":true,"created_at":"2020-09-16T11:35:07.354-06:00","updated_at":"2020-09-16T11:45:21.806-06:00","judge_type":"United States Magistrate Judge","court_id":2102,"key_case":false,"non_subscription":false,"internal_notes":null,"sign_off":null,"notes":null,"google_scholar_link":null,"opinion":{"url":null},"opinion_cache":null,"in_dropbox":false,"cached_tag_list":"Custody or Control, Cooperation of counsel, Redaction, Sanctions, Proportionality, Costs and Fees, Failure to Produce","no_link_found":false,"last_reviewed_on":null,"qc_complete":false,"linked_federal_rules":"Fed. R. Civ. P. 34, Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, Fed. R. Civ. P. 33, Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 -- effective 12/1/15","tag_overturn":false,"rule_overturn":false,"unpublished":false,"needs_update":null,"full_text_verified":null,"google_scholar_text_type":"westlaw","full_case_visibility":null,"modal_ready":true,"formatting_errors":false,"style_errors":null,"opinion_pdf_attached":false,"display_opinion_file":false,"court_display_name":"United States District Court, C.D. California","parsed_attributes":null,"full_name":null,"mdl":null,"parser_qc_complete":false,"parser_issue_type":null,"use_eda_format":true,"case_title":"PureCircle USA Inc., et al., v. SweeGen, Inc., et al.","docket_number":"Case No. 8:18-cv-01679-JVS (JDEx)","counsel":"Richard T. Mulloy, Catherine Huang, Jacob D. Anderson, DLA Piper LLP, San Diego, CA, Brent O. Hatch, Pro Hac Vice, Hatch James and Dodge PC, Lara A. Swensen, Pro Hac Vice, James Dodge Russell and Stephens PC, Salt Lake City, UT, Dawn M. Jenkins, Pro Hac Vice, DLA Piper LLP, Houston, TX, Patrick S. Park, DLA Piper LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Stuart Pollack, Pro Hac Vice, DLA Piper LLP US, New York, NY, for PureCircle USA Inc., et al. David J. Tsai, Kenneth E. Keller, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, San Francisco, CA, Alton L. Hare, Pro Hac Vice, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Washington, DC, Michael S. Horikawa, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for SweeGen, Inc., et al.","decision_title":"Proceedings: (In Chambers) Order re: Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel [Dkt. 99]","additional_dates":[],"decision_date_label":"Filed","has_tables":false,"has_table_of_contents":false,"disposition":"Motion to Compel","image_display_errors":false,"de_updated_at":null,"de_updated_by_id":null,"ready_for_review":false,"de_further_review":false,"appellate_case":false,"de_further_review_notes":"","appellate_info":"","tag_list":["Custody or Control","Cooperation of counsel","Redaction","Sanctions","Proportionality","Costs and Fees","Failure to Produce"]}}],"additionalFilings":[],"currentUser":null,"isAdmin":false}