Global Aerospace Inc. v. Landow Aviation, LP
Global Aerospace Inc. v. Landow Aviation, LP
2012 WL 1431215 (Va. Cir. 2012)
April 23, 2012
Chamblin, James H., Judge
Summary
The court granted the motion to use predictive coding for the processing and production of ESI. The defendants were given 60 days to complete the processing and production, and the receiving party was allowed to raise any issues with the completeness or contents of the production or the ongoing use of predictive coding. The motion was endorsed by counsel for Landow Aviation Limited Partnership and Landow Aviation I, Inc., and was seen and objected to by counsel for M.I.C. Industries, Inc. and Landow & Company Builders, Inc.
GLOBAL AEROSPACE INC., et al., Plaintiff,
v.
LANDOW AVIATION, L.P. d/b/a Dulles Jet Center, et al., Defendants
v.
LANDOW AVIATION, L.P. d/b/a Dulles Jet Center, et al., Defendants
No. CL 61040
Circuit Court of Virginia, Loudoun County
April 23, 2012
Counsel
Jonathan M. Stern (VA Bar No. 41930), Gordon S. Woodward (VA Bar No. 42449), Counsel for Landow Aviation Limited Partnership and Landow Aviation I, Inc.Chamblin, James H., Judge
Order Approving the USE of Predictive Coding for Discovery
Global Aerospace Inc., et al. v. Landow Aviation, L.P. d/b/a Dulles Jet Center, et al. (Case No. CL 61010)
BAE Systems Survivability Systems, LLC v. Landow Aviation, L.P, et al. (Case No. CL 61991)
La Réunion Aérienne v. Landow Aviation, L.P. d/b/a Dulles Jet Center, et al. (Case No. CL 64475)
United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Landow Aviation, L.P., et al. (Case No. CL 63795)
Chartis Aerospace Adjustment Services, Inc. v. Landow Builders Inc., et al. (Case No. CL 63190)
Factory Mutual Insurance Company v. Landow Builders Inc., et al. (Case No. CL 63575)
The Travelers Indemnity Company, as subrogee of Landow Aviation Limited Partnership v. Bascon, Inc., et al. (Case No. CL 61909)
Global Aerospace, Inc. v. J. H. Brandt and Associates, Inc., et al. (Case No. CL 61712)
M.I.C. Industries, Inc. v. Landow Aviation, L.P., et al. (Case No. 71633)
Having heard argument with regard to the Motion of Landow Aviation Limited Partnership, Landow Aviation I, Inc., and Landow & Company Builders, Inc., pursuant to Virginia Rules of Supreme Court 4:1(b) and (c) and 4:15, it is hereby ordered Defendants shall be allowed to proceed with the use of predictive coding for purposes of the processing and production of electronically stored information, with processing to be completed with 60 days and production to follow as soon as practicable and in no more than 60 days.
This is without prejudice to a receiving party raising with the court an issue as to completeness or the contents of the produdtion or the ongoing use of predictive coding.
Entered this 23rd day of April, 2012.
<<signature>>
James H. Chamblin
Loudoun County Circuit Judge
We ask for this:
<<signature>>
Jonathan M. Stern (VA Bar No. 41930)
Gordon S. Woodward (VA Bar No. 42449)
Endorsements waived pursuant to Rule 1:13
See and Objected to
<<signature>>
William G. Laxton Sr.
Counsel for M.I.C. Industries, Inc.
We ask for this:
<<signature>>
Danielle M. LaCoe (VSB #78715)
Attorney for Landow & Company Builders, Inc.