{"favorites":{},"caseDigest":{"id":17462,"deleted":false,"created_at":"2013-05-21T16:40:49.027-06:00","updated_at":"2020-08-14T14:56:21.533-06:00","last_published_at":"2016-01-12T08:46:07.303-07:00","is_digested":false,"pdf":"united_states_v._larson20181205-7067-tj31vj.pdf","published_revision":{"id":40196,"name":"United States v. Larson","full_text":"The editors have not yet created a digest for this case.","cite":"66 M.J. 212 (C.A.A.F. 2008)","judge":"Ryan, Margaret A.","decision_date":"2008-04-25T00:00:00.000-06:00","case_digest_id":17462,"published":true,"created_at":"2015-12-21T20:05:29.255-07:00","updated_at":"2017-04-25T21:50:45.094-06:00","judge_type":"United States Circuit Court Judge","court_id":2078,"key_case":false,"non_subscription":false,"internal_notes":"","sign_off":null,"notes":"","google_scholar_link":"","opinion":{"url":null},"opinion_cache":null,"in_dropbox":false,"cached_tag_list":"Competency of Counsel, Criminal","no_link_found":true,"autolinked_full_text":"The editors have not yet created a digest for this case.","last_reviewed_on":"2015-12-21","qc_complete":false,"linked_federal_rules":"","tag_overturn":false,"rule_overturn":false,"unpublished":null,"needs_update":null,"google_scholar_text":null,"full_text_verified":null,"google_scholar_text_type":null,"full_case_visibility":false,"modal_ready":false,"formatting_errors":false,"style_errors":null,"opinion_pdf_attached":false,"display_opinion_file":false,"court_display_name":null,"parsed_attributes":null,"full_name":null,"mdl":null,"parser_qc_complete":false,"parser_issue_type":null,"use_eda_format":false,"case_title":null,"docket_number":null,"counsel":null,"decision_title":null,"body_text":null,"additional_dates":[],"decision_date_label":"","has_tables":false,"has_table_of_contents":false,"disposition":null,"image_display_errors":false,"de_updated_at":null,"de_updated_by_id":null,"ready_for_review":false,"de_further_review":false,"appellate_case":false,"de_further_review_notes":null,"appellate_info":null,"tag_list":["Competency of Counsel","Criminal"]},"state_rules":[],"federal_rules":[],"district_rules":[]},"scholarText":"

","relatedCases":[{"id":21345,"deleted":false,"created_at":"2017-11-22T11:53:53.615-07:00","updated_at":"2020-05-11T11:50:38.870-06:00","last_published_at":"2020-05-11T11:50:32.368-06:00","is_digested":false,"pdf":"black_v._state20200511-4-7hfxe5.pdf","slug":"21345-black-v-state","published_revision":{"id":58398,"name":"Black v. State","cite":"2017 WL 5507730 (Wyo. 2017)","judge":"Burke, E. James","decision_date":"2017-11-17T00:00:00.000-07:00","case_digest_id":21345,"published":true,"created_at":"2017-11-27T13:31:11.537-07:00","updated_at":"2020-05-11T11:50:31.691-06:00","judge_type":"Supreme Court Judge","court_id":2336,"key_case":false,"non_subscription":false,"internal_notes":null,"sign_off":null,"notes":"","google_scholar_link":"","opinion":{"url":null},"opinion_cache":null,"in_dropbox":false,"cached_tag_list":"Competency of Counsel, Exclusion of Evidence, Facebook, Social Media, Photograph, Criminal, Mobile Device, Text Messages, Bad Faith, Sanctions, Failure to Produce","no_link_found":true,"last_reviewed_on":null,"qc_complete":true,"linked_federal_rules":"","tag_overturn":false,"rule_overturn":false,"unpublished":false,"needs_update":null,"full_text_verified":true,"google_scholar_text_type":"westlaw","full_case_visibility":true,"modal_ready":true,"formatting_errors":false,"style_errors":false,"opinion_pdf_attached":false,"display_opinion_file":false,"court_display_name":"Supreme Court of Wyoming","parsed_attributes":null,"full_name":null,"mdl":null,"parser_qc_complete":false,"parser_issue_type":null,"use_eda_format":true,"case_title":"Joshua Roy Delbert BLACK, Appellant (Defendant), v. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellee (Plaintiff)","docket_number":"S-15-0295","counsel":"Representing Appellant: Office of the State Public Defender: Diane M. Lozano, State Public Defender; Patricia L. Bennett*, Appellate Counsel. Argument by Ms. Bennett. Representing Appellee: Peter K. Michael, Attorney General; David L. Delicath, Deputy Attorney General; Christyne M. Martens, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Caitlin F. Harper, Assistant Attorney General; Becket B. Hinckley, Special Assistant Attorney General. Argument by Mr. Hinckley. Before BURKE, C.J., and HILL, DAVIS, FOX, and KAUTZ, JJ.","decision_title":"Opinion","additional_dates":[],"decision_date_label":"","has_tables":false,"has_table_of_contents":false,"disposition":"","image_display_errors":false,"de_updated_at":"2020-04-13T18:47:56.000-06:00","de_updated_by_id":536,"ready_for_review":false,"de_further_review":false,"appellate_case":true,"de_further_review_notes":"","appellate_info":null,"tag_list":["Competency of Counsel","Exclusion of Evidence","Facebook","Social Media","Photograph","Criminal","Mobile Device","Text Messages","Bad Faith","Sanctions","Failure to Produce"]}},{"id":17450,"deleted":false,"created_at":"2013-05-21T16:40:48.096-06:00","updated_at":"2019-11-05T14:27:08.223-07:00","last_published_at":"2017-06-06T22:50:18.860-06:00","is_digested":false,"pdf":"united_states_v._ganier20191105-4-1xxbefo.pdf","slug":"17450-united-states-v-ganier","published_revision":{"id":43736,"name":"United States v. Ganier","cite":"468 F.3d 920 (6th Cir. 2006)","judge":"Nelson-Moore, Karen","decision_date":"2006-11-15T00:00:00.000-07:00","case_digest_id":17450,"published":true,"created_at":"2016-01-16T07:44:01.784-07:00","updated_at":"2019-12-06T12:03:47.425-07:00","judge_type":"United States Circuit Court Judge","court_id":2153,"key_case":false,"non_subscription":false,"internal_notes":"","sign_off":null,"notes":"","google_scholar_link":"http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8591446126195782458&q=/+United+States+v.+Ganier&hl=en&as_sdt=6,34&as_ylo=2006&as_yhi=2007","opinion":{"url":null},"opinion_cache":null,"in_dropbox":false,"cached_tag_list":"Criminal, Exclusion of Evidence, Spoliation, Failure to Preserve, Competency of Counsel, Sanctions, Search Terms","no_link_found":false,"last_reviewed_on":"2015-12-29","qc_complete":false,"linked_federal_rules":"","tag_overturn":false,"rule_overturn":false,"unpublished":false,"needs_update":null,"full_text_verified":true,"google_scholar_text_type":"scholar","full_case_visibility":true,"modal_ready":true,"formatting_errors":false,"style_errors":false,"opinion_pdf_attached":false,"display_opinion_file":false,"court_display_name":null,"parsed_attributes":null,"full_name":null,"mdl":null,"parser_qc_complete":false,"parser_issue_type":null,"use_eda_format":false,"case_title":null,"docket_number":null,"counsel":null,"decision_title":null,"additional_dates":[],"decision_date_label":"","has_tables":false,"has_table_of_contents":false,"disposition":null,"image_display_errors":false,"de_updated_at":null,"de_updated_by_id":null,"ready_for_review":false,"de_further_review":false,"appellate_case":false,"de_further_review_notes":null,"appellate_info":null,"tag_list":["Criminal","Exclusion of Evidence","Spoliation","Failure to Preserve","Competency of Counsel","Sanctions","Search Terms"]}},{"id":25629,"deleted":false,"created_at":"2019-12-03T11:43:33.666-07:00","updated_at":"2019-12-04T09:57:54.677-07:00","last_published_at":"2019-12-04T09:57:43.532-07:00","is_digested":false,"pdf":"united_states_v._kenner20191204-4-c29abn.pdf","slug":"25629-united-states-v-kenner","published_revision":{"id":68344,"name":"United States v. Kenner","cite":"2019 WL 4894238 (E.D.N.Y. 2019)","judge":"Bianco, Joseph F.","decision_date":"2019-10-04T00:00:00.000-06:00","case_digest_id":25629,"published":true,"created_at":"2019-12-03T11:43:33.673-07:00","updated_at":"2019-12-06T12:40:40.550-07:00","judge_type":"United States Circuit Judge","court_id":2220,"key_case":false,"non_subscription":false,"internal_notes":null,"sign_off":null,"notes":null,"google_scholar_link":null,"opinion":{"url":null},"opinion_cache":null,"in_dropbox":false,"cached_tag_list":"Competency of Counsel, Authentication, Audio, Text Messages, Failure to Produce, Criminal","no_link_found":false,"last_reviewed_on":null,"qc_complete":false,"linked_federal_rules":"","tag_overturn":false,"rule_overturn":false,"unpublished":false,"needs_update":null,"full_text_verified":null,"google_scholar_text_type":"westlaw","full_case_visibility":null,"modal_ready":true,"formatting_errors":false,"style_errors":null,"opinion_pdf_attached":false,"display_opinion_file":false,"court_display_name":"United States District Court, E.D. New York","parsed_attributes":null,"full_name":null,"mdl":null,"parser_qc_complete":false,"parser_issue_type":null,"use_eda_format":true,"case_title":"United States of America, v. Phillip A. Kenner and Tommy C. Constantine, Defendants","docket_number":"No. 13-CR-607 (JFB)","counsel":"The United States is represented by Assistant United States Attorneys Saritha Komatireddy and Matthew Haggans of the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York, 271 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, New York 11201. Defendant Phillip A. Kenner is proceeding pro se. Defendant Tommy C. Constantine is represented by Sanford Talkin of Talkin, Muccigrosso & Roberts LLP, 40 Exchange Place, 18th Floor, New York, New York 10005; and by Michael Morrissey of Mitchell Stein Carey P.C., One Renaissance Square, 2 North Central Ave., Suite 1900, Phoenix, Arizona 85004.","decision_title":"MEMORANDUM AND ORDER","additional_dates":[],"decision_date_label":"Signed","has_tables":false,"has_table_of_contents":false,"disposition":null,"image_display_errors":false,"de_updated_at":null,"de_updated_by_id":null,"ready_for_review":false,"de_further_review":false,"appellate_case":false,"de_further_review_notes":null,"appellate_info":null,"tag_list":["Competency of Counsel","Authentication","Audio","Text Messages","Failure to Produce","Criminal"]}},{"id":25758,"deleted":false,"created_at":"2019-12-09T10:19:25.364-07:00","updated_at":"2019-12-11T10:54:39.443-07:00","last_published_at":"2019-12-11T10:54:34.927-07:00","is_digested":false,"pdf":"state_v._mc_kee20191211-4-214bld.pdf","slug":"25758-state-v-mckee","published_revision":{"id":68533,"name":"State v. McKee","cite":"2019 WL 5304607 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)","judge":"Shaw, Stephen R.","decision_date":"2019-10-21T00:00:00.000-06:00","case_digest_id":25758,"published":true,"created_at":"2019-12-09T10:19:25.374-07:00","updated_at":"2019-12-11T10:54:34.727-07:00","judge_type":"Judge","court_id":2236,"key_case":false,"non_subscription":false,"internal_notes":null,"sign_off":null,"notes":null,"google_scholar_link":null,"opinion":{"url":null},"opinion_cache":null,"in_dropbox":false,"cached_tag_list":"Competency of Counsel, Criminal","no_link_found":false,"last_reviewed_on":null,"qc_complete":false,"linked_federal_rules":"","tag_overturn":false,"rule_overturn":false,"unpublished":false,"needs_update":null,"full_text_verified":null,"google_scholar_text_type":"westlaw","full_case_visibility":null,"modal_ready":true,"formatting_errors":false,"style_errors":null,"opinion_pdf_attached":false,"display_opinion_file":false,"court_display_name":"Court of Appeals of Ohio, Third District, Logan County","parsed_attributes":null,"full_name":null,"mdl":null,"parser_qc_complete":false,"parser_issue_type":null,"use_eda_format":true,"case_title":"STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. CHASSITY L. MCKEE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT","docket_number":"CASE NO. 8-19-16","counsel":"Sean P. Martin for Appellant Alice Robinson-Bond for Appellee","decision_title":"OPINION","additional_dates":[],"decision_date_label":"Decided","has_tables":false,"has_table_of_contents":false,"disposition":null,"image_display_errors":false,"de_updated_at":null,"de_updated_by_id":null,"ready_for_review":false,"de_further_review":false,"appellate_case":false,"de_further_review_notes":null,"appellate_info":null,"tag_list":["Competency of Counsel","Criminal"]}},{"id":25230,"deleted":false,"created_at":"2019-10-01T11:16:16.899-06:00","updated_at":"2019-11-05T15:06:08.167-07:00","last_published_at":"2019-10-01T11:17:34.125-06:00","is_digested":false,"pdf":"state_v._ramos20191105-4-1d9htfj.pdf","slug":"25230-state-v-ramos","published_revision":{"id":67572,"name":"State v. Ramos","cite":"2019 WL 4200596 (Wash. Ct. App. 2019)","judge":"Siddoway, Laurel H.","decision_date":"2019-09-05T00:00:00.000-06:00","case_digest_id":25230,"published":true,"created_at":"2019-10-01T11:16:16.905-06:00","updated_at":"2019-12-06T12:39:22.658-07:00","judge_type":"Appellate Court Judge","court_id":2320,"key_case":false,"non_subscription":false,"internal_notes":null,"sign_off":null,"notes":null,"google_scholar_link":null,"opinion":{"url":null},"opinion_cache":null,"in_dropbox":false,"cached_tag_list":"Privacy, Competency of Counsel, Mobile Device, Criminal","no_link_found":false,"last_reviewed_on":null,"qc_complete":false,"linked_federal_rules":"","tag_overturn":false,"rule_overturn":false,"unpublished":true,"needs_update":null,"full_text_verified":null,"google_scholar_text_type":"westlaw","full_case_visibility":null,"modal_ready":true,"formatting_errors":false,"style_errors":null,"opinion_pdf_attached":false,"display_opinion_file":false,"court_display_name":"Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3","parsed_attributes":null,"full_name":null,"mdl":null,"parser_qc_complete":false,"parser_issue_type":null,"use_eda_format":true,"case_title":"STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. David RAMOS, Appellant","docket_number":"No. 35843-7-III","counsel":"Marie Jean Trombley, Attorney at Law, Po Box 829, Graham, WA, 98338-0829, for Appellant. Larry D. Steinmetz, Cnty Prosc. Atty. Office, 1100 W Mallon Ave, Spokane, WA, 99260-2043, for Respondent","decision_title":"UNPUBLISHED OPINION","additional_dates":[],"decision_date_label":"Filed","has_tables":false,"has_table_of_contents":false,"disposition":null,"image_display_errors":false,"de_updated_at":null,"de_updated_by_id":null,"ready_for_review":false,"de_further_review":false,"appellate_case":false,"de_further_review_notes":null,"appellate_info":null,"tag_list":["Privacy","Competency of Counsel","Mobile Device","Criminal"]}}],"additionalFilings":[],"currentUser":null,"isAdmin":false}