Twitter, Inc. v. Musk
Twitter, Inc. v. Musk
2022 WL 4675749 (Del. Ch. 2022)
October 1, 2022
Sampling
Privilege Log
Redaction
In Camera Review
Special Master
Download PDF
To Cite List
Summary
The Court has instructed the parties to exchange lists of 40 documents and submit their privilege logs and a list of key players. The hard copies should be bound and tabbed, and include a table of contents. Additionally, the Court has instructed that any redactions should be “see through” so that the Court can understand what information was withheld.
Additional Decisions
Note: This is an unpublished decision. Check your jurisdiction’s rules about citing unpublished decisions before citing this case to a court.
Re: Twitter, Inc.
v.
Elon R. Musk et al
C.A. No. 2022-0613-KSJM
Court of Chancery of Delaware
October 01, 2022

Counsel

Peter J. Walsh, Jr., Esquire, Kevin R. Shannon, Esquire, Christopher N. Kelly, Esquire, Mathew A. Golden, Esquire, Callan R. Jackson, Esquire, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, 1313 N. Market Street, Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor, Wilmington, DE 19801
Brad D. Sorrels, Esquire, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., 222 Delaware Avenue, Suite 800, Wilmington, DE 19801
Edward B. Micheletti, Esquire, Lauren N. Rosenello, Esquire, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, 920 N. King Street, 7th Floor, P.O. Box 636, Wilmington, DE 19899-0636

Opinion

*1 Dear Counsel:
By an Order dated September 30, 2022 (the “Order”), I appointed The Honorable Christopher Sontchi of Delaware ADR, LLC to serve as Special Discovery Master in this action. After Judge Sontchi filed his acceptance of the appointment on the docket, an unanticipated conflict arose. In light of that, I will now handle the in camera contemplated by the Order.
The representative set selected for each motion will now be reduced from 200 to 40 documents. The parties are instructed to exchange their respective lists of 40 documents by 5 p.m. tomorrow, October 2. The receiving party will then deliver two hard copy sets of the 40 documents identified by the movant to my Chambers by 4:30 p.m. on October 3.
If a selected document was produced with redactions, then the redactions should be “see through” so that I can understand what information was withheld. If the selected document is part of a family of documents, then the document's family members may be included in the hard copy set. With the hard copies, the parties shall submit their privilege logs and a list of key players. Please also bind and tab the hard copies, and include a table of contents.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Sincerely,
Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick Chancellor