Princess Pedicure Spas, Inc. v. Chisel Nail Art, LLC
Princess Pedicure Spas, Inc. v. Chisel Nail Art, LLC
2023 WL 4763974 (M.D. Fla. 2023)
July 26, 2023

Price, Leslie H.,  United States Magistrate Judge

General Objections
Protective Order
Third Party Subpoena
Failure to Produce
Form of Production
Native Format
Download PDF
To Cite List
Summary
The Court granted Plaintiff's motion in part and denied it in part, ordering Chisel to produce gross sales documents, purchase requests, and native format accounting records in their native electronic format. The Court also granted Defendants' Motion to Quash Subpoenas and for Protective Order. This ensures that the documents are produced in their original form, which is necessary for an accurate review of the documents.
PRINCESS PEDICURE SPAS, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
CHISEL NAIL ART, LLC, Sunny Beauty Supply Corp. and Tuan Nguyen, Defendants
Case No: 6:22-cv-2406-WWB-LHP
United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Signed July 26, 2023

Counsel

Stephen D. Milbrath, Ferdinand Fred Mario Romano, Accel IP Law, PLLC, Cocoa, FL, for Plaintiff.
Melissa Dangond, Ryan Thomas Santurri, Brian R. Gilchrist, Allen, Dyer, Doppelt & Gilchrist, P.A., Orlando, FL, for Defendants.
Price, Leslie H., United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

*1 This cause comes before the Court following a hearing on Plaintiff's Short-Form Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 33) and Defendants Chisel Nail Art, LLC and Sunny Beauty Supply Corp.’s Motion to Quash Subpoenas and for Protective Order (Doc. No. 50). This Order memorializes the rulings made at the hearing.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth on the record at the hearing, it is ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff's Short-Form Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 33) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
a. The motion as it relates to Requests 7, 21, 23, 26, 35, 36, 40 and 64 is DENIED as moot as those issues were resolved amongst the parties. See Doc. No. 59.
b. The motion as it relates to Request 3 is DENIED, with the exception that Chisel Nail Art, LLC (hereinafter “Chisel”) is DIRECTED to produce gross sales documents for October 24, 2020 through October 23, 2021.
c. The motion as it relates to Request 4 is GRANTED. Chisel's undue burden and other boilerplate objections are OVERRULED. Chisel shall produce all outstanding documents in its current possession, custody, or control responsive to this Request, which includes any responsive documents in the possession of its accountants. See, e.g., Doerr v. Abplanalp, No. 6:19-cv-1194-Orl-40LRH, 2020 WL 6870912, at *7 (M.D. Fla. Sept. 3, 2020); United States ex rel. Chabot v. Peredes, No. 6:06-cv-1532-Orl-31KRS, 2009 WL 10679598, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 1, 2009). “Native format accounting system” shall be interpreted as to its common and ordinary meaning.
d. The motion as it relates to Request 5 is GRANTED, and Chisel's overbreadth objection is OVERRULED. Chisel must produce responsive documents in its current possession, custody, or control for the time period of October 24, 2021 through October 23, 2022, which includes any responsive documents in the possession of its accountants. “Native electronic format” shall be interpreted as to its common and ordinary meaning.
e. The motion as it relates to Request 9 is DENIED as the Request is patently overbroad.
f. The motion as it relates to Requests 10–13 is GRANTED in part, to the extent that Chisel must produce purchase requests (purchase orders) from October 24, 2020 through October 23, 2022, made to the named suppliers for raw materials for products Chisel sold to Plaintiff during this time period. As set forth at the hearing, the Court is requiring only the production of documents evidencing purchases. Chisel may designate these documents as “attorney's eyes only” pursuant to the parties’ confidentiality agreement, subject to the remaining terms set forth in that agreement.
g. The motion as it relates to Request 17 is DENIED.
*2 h. The motion as it relates to Request 47 is GRANTED, and Chisel must produce all outstanding documents in its current possession, custody, or control responsive to this Request, which includes any responsive documents in the possession of its accountants. “Native electronic format accounting records” shall be interpreted as to its common and ordinary meaning.
i. The motion as it relates to Request 53 is DENIED without prejudice, as the production is likely encompassed within the Court's prior rulings. Plaintiff may revisit this discovery, if appropriate, after Chisel's production in accordance with this Order. As discussed at the hearing, in the alternative, Plaintiff may consider serving interrogatories to develop a more targeted inquiry.
j. The motion as it relates to Request 56 is GRANTED, and Chisel must produce all outstanding documents in its current possession, custody, or control responsive to this Request, which includes any responsive documents in the possession of its accountants. “Native format accounting records” shall be interpreted as to its common and ordinary meaning.
k. Chisel must produce to Plaintiff all responsive materials as required by this Order within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order.
l. Chisel is cautioned that going forward, document production must include documents within its current possession, custody, and/or control, which includes documents within its control that are in the possession of its accountants.
2. Defendants Chisel Nail Art, LLC and Sunny Beauty Supply Corp.’s Motion to Quash Subpoenas and for Protective Order (Doc. No. 50) is GRANTED.
DONE and ORDERED in Orlando, Florida on July 26, 2023.