Demarchi, Virginia K., United States Magistrate Judge
This Document Relates To: All Actions
Counsel
Lauren R. Goldman (pro hac vice), Darcy C. Harris (pro hac vice), Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, NY; Elizabeth K. McCloskey, Abigail A. Barrera, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, San Francisco, CA; Trenton J. Van Oss (pro hac vice), Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, DC; Michael G. Rhodes, Kyle C. Wong, Caroline A. Lebel, Cooley LLP, San Francisco, CAAttorneys for Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc.
Jason ‘Jay’ Barnes (pro hac vice), Simmons Hanly Conroy LLC, New York, NY; Geoffrey Graber, Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC, Washington, DC; Jeffrey A. Koncius, Nicole Ramirez, Kiesel Law LLP, Beverly Hills, CA; Beth E. Terrell, Terrell Marshall Law Group PLLC, Seattle, WA; Andre M.Mura, Gibbs Law Group LLP, Oakland, CA
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
PUTATIVE CLASS ACTION STIPULATED ADDENDUM TO PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ORDER
Re: Dkt. No. 290
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiffs and Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (together, “the
Parties”) by and through their respective counsel of record, respectfully submit this stipulated
addendum to the Protective Order and [Proposed] Order.
WHEREAS, on May 5, 2023, the Parties submitted for the Court’s approval two competing
versions of a protective order to be entered in this action (Dkt. 231);
WHEREAS, the Parties agreed that they would “submit an addendum regarding the process by
which handwritten [Source Code] notes are transmitted to the secure eDiscovery/litigation support
site,” as discussed in Section 8 of the Parties’ proposed protective orders (Dkt. 231-1 at 28 n.1; Dkt.
231-2 at 27 n.1);
WHEREAS, on May 16, 2023, the Court entered a Protective Order (Dkt. 242); and
WHEREAS, the Parties have now agreed on the process by which handwritten Source Code
notes may be securely transmitted to a secure eDiscovery/litigation support site, and the Parties now
wish to submit a stipulated addendum to the Protective Order on this topic;
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, subject to the Court’s approval, pursuant
to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the following provisions will be added to
the Protective Order to govern the process by which handwritten Source Code notes may be securely
transmitted to a secure eDiscovery/litigation support site. The Parties incorporate by reference all terms
as defined in the Protective Order.
Section 8(k) Any handwritten Source Code notes may be stored with a secure
eDiscovery/litigation support site authorized to receive Disclosure or Discovery Material designated
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” pursuant to section 7.5(e) after the eDiscovery
vendor and its personnel sign the “Acknowledgement and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A) in
order to allow for such notes to be viewed by the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel and/or Experts
qualified under Section 7.5(b) of this Order. To transmit handwritten Source Code notes to the
authorized eDiscovery/litigation support site, the author of the handwritten Source Code notes may
create a single digital copy of the Source Code notes by digitally scanning them using a secure
methodology. This single digital copy of the handwritten Source Code notes shall be designated as
and labeled “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE.” Before being transmitted to the eDiscovery/litigation support site by the author of the handwritten Source Code notes, the electronic
Source Code notes file must be password protected. The author’s transmission of any and all Source
Code notes—including the single digital copy of handwritten Source Code notes—to the
eDiscovery/litigation support site shall be via a secure, password-protected SFTP transmission that
aligns with standard industry practices regarding data security, and the transmission via SFTP shall not
include any other recipients. Once the eDiscovery/litigation support site vendor confirms receipt of
the digital version of the handwritten Source Code notes, the author of the handwritten Source Code
notes must promptly and pJermanently delete (1) the digital copy of the handwritten notes from the
SFTP platform, and (2) the digital copy of the handwritten notes in their possession.
Access to such handwritten Source Code notes via the secure eDiscovery/litigation support site
will be restricted to the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel and/or Experts qualified under Section
7.5(b) of the Protective Order, and functions allowing for duplication of such notes, including but not
limited to printing, emailing, downloading, and saving, will be disabled. The Receiving Party is
otherwise prohibited from creating any copies (physical or electronic) or images of handwritten Source
Code notes.
CIVIL L.R. 5-1(h)(3) ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(h)(3), I, Lauren R. Goldman, hereby attest under penalty of
perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from all signatories.
Dated: August 4, 2023
By: /s/ Lauren R. Goldman
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 7, 2023