Facebook, Inc. v. OnlineNIC Inc.
Facebook, Inc. v. OnlineNIC Inc.
Case No. 5:19-cv-07071-SVK (N.D. Cal. 2020)
February 18, 2020

van Keulen, Susan,  United States Magistrate Judge

FRE 502(d)
Clawback
Waiver
Attorney-Client Privilege
Attorney Work-Product
Download PDF
To Cite List
Summary
The court ruled that any Documents at issue in a privilege challenge must be filed under seal for in camera review pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5. This ensures that the privileged information is not disclosed to the public and is only seen by the court. Additionally, any party that is aware that it has obtained privileged or work-product-protected information must immediately notify the opposing party and return or destroy such information or Documents.
Additional Decisions
FACEBOOK, INC. and INSTAGRAM, LLC, Plaintiffs,
v.
ONLINENIC INC., DOMAIN ID SHIELD SERVICE CO., LIMITED, and DOES 1-20, Defendants
Case No. 5:19-cv-07071-SVK
United States District Court, N.D. California
Filed February 18, 2020

Counsel

David J. Steele, Howard A. Kroll, Steven E. Lauridsen, TUCKER ELLIS LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiffs, FACEBOOK, INC. and INSTAGRAM, LLC.
Perry J. Narancic, LEXANALYTICA, PC, Palo Alto, CA, Attorneys for Defendants, ONLINENIC, INC. and DOMAIN ID SHIELD SERVICES CO., LIMITED
van Keulen, Susan, United States Magistrate Judge

STIPULATED FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 502(D) ORDER AND CLAWBACK AGREEMENT

1. PURPOSE

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence 502(d), the production or disclosure of any privileged or otherwise protected documents (as defined by Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(1)) and accompanying metadata (“Documents™), shall not result in the waiver of any privilege or other protection (including, without limitation, the attorney-client privilege, the work-product doctrine, the joint defense privilege, or any other applicable privilege) associated with such Documents as to the receiving party or any third parties. The production or disclosure shall not result in any waiver, including subject matter waiver, of any kind, in this or in any other state or federal proceeding regardless of the circumstances of disclosure pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d). This Paragraph shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) with regard to Documents.

2. CLAWBACK AGREEMENT

In the event that a producing party discovers that it produced Documents subject to a legally recognized claim of privilege or work-product protection, it shall provide written notice of the claim to the receiving party (a “Clawback Notice™), identifying the subject Documents within thirty days of the discovery.

3. PROCEDURES FOLLOWING CLAWBACK NOTICE

a) Within ten business days of receipt of a Clawback Notice (regardless of whether the receiving party agrees with the producing party’s claim of privilege) or a receiving party’s own determination that information it received is privileged or work-product-protected, the receiving party must promptly return and/or destroy the Document(s), all copies thereof, and any notes that reproduce, copy, or otherwise disclose the substance of the information for which privilege is claimed, and notify the producing party when this is complete.

b) If a receiving party challenges a claim that a Document specified in a Clawback Notice is privileged or work-product-protected, the receiving party shall notify the producing party of its positions within fourteen days of receiving the Clawback Notice asserting the claim. Within fourteen days of the producing party’s receiving notification of the dispute, the parties shall meet and confer in an effort to resolve their disagreement. If the parties are unable to resolve their disagreement, either party may submit the issue to the Court for a determination and may submit the Document(s) at issue for in camera review pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5. In submitting such a dispute to the Court, the parties must follow the procedure outlined in Civil Local Rule 37 and this Court’s Civil and Discovery Referral Matters Standing Order. The Document(s) covered by the Clawback Notice shall not be used or disclosed by the receiving party during the time in which the parties are meeting and conferring about the privileged nature of the Document(s) or during the time in which the privilege dispute is before the Court.

4. PROHIBITION ON USE OF PRIVILEGED INFORMATION

To the extent any party is aware that it has obtained privileged or work-product-protected, information, or has received a Clawback Notice, or it is reasonably apparent that the party has obtained, privileged or work-product-protected information through production, disclosure, or communications, such information may not be submitted to the Court (except in connection with a challenge of the privilege assertion) or presented for admission into evidence or sought in discovery in this proceeding or in any other proceeding or action. The party must immediately notify the opposing party of its possession of such privileged information and return or destroy such information or Documents. Any Documents at issue in a privilege challenge that are filed with the Court must be filed under seal for in camera review pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.

ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that all other signatories listed and on whose behalf this filing is made concur in the filing of this document and have granted permission to use an electronic signature.

/s/David J. Steele

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.