Floyd v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Floyd v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Case 2:22-cv-01599-KKE (W.D. Wash. 2023)
December 15, 2023

Evanson, Kymberly K.,  United States District Judge

Protective Order
Third Party Subpoena
Attorney-Client Privilege
Waiver
Authentication
Failure to Produce
Attorney Work-Product
Clawback
Download PDF
To Cite List
Summary
A protective order was established to govern the handling and disclosure of confidential information, including ESI. The order outlines procedures for designating and handling ESI, including providing notice and allowing for challenges to confidentiality designations. It also requires parties to implement data security measures and cooperate in the event of a data breach.
Additional Decisions
STEVEN FLOYD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff,
v.
AMAZON.COM, INC. and APPLE INC., Defendants
Case No. 2:22-cv-01599-KKE
United States District Court, W.D. Washington at Seattle
Filed December 15, 2023
Evanson, Kymberly K., United States District Judge

PROTECTIVE ORDER

1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS

Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, trade secret, commercially sensitive, or private information for which special protection may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this agreement is consistent with LCR 26(c). It does not confer blanket protection on all disclosures or responses to discovery, the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles, and it does not presumptively entitle parties to file confidential information under seal. The availability of protection pursuant to this Stipulated Protective Order does not preclude a party from withholding information protected by any applicable privilege. Nothing in this Stipulated Protective Order shall restrict in any way the right of a Producing Party to disclose or make use of its own documents or Discovery Material. Under LCR 26(c)(2), the parties began with the District’s Model Protective Order, and have identified departures from the model in a redlined copy, attached as Exhibit 1.

2. DEFINITIONS

2.1 Challenging Party: A Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order.

2.2 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and In-House Counsel (as well as their support staff) to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation.

2.3 Designating Party: A Party, Non-Party, person, or entity designating documents or information as Protected Information under this Order.

2.4 Discovery Material: All items or information, including from any non-party, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter.

2.5 Expert: A person with specialized knowledge or experience in an area pertinent to the litigation who (1) has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action, (2) is not a past or current employee of a Party or of a Party’s competitor, and (3) at the time of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or of a Party’s competitor.

2.6 In-House Counsel: Attorneys (and their support staff, including legal secondees and economists) who are employees or contractors of a Party and whose responsibilities include overseeing, working on, or supporting this action. In-House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel.

2.7 Non-Party: Any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action.

2.8 Outside Counsel of Record: Attorneys who are not employees of a Party to this action but are retained to represent or advise a Party to this action and have appeared in this action or are affiliated with a law firm that has appeared on behalf of that Party in this action.

2.9 Party: Any Party to this action, including all its officers, directors, employees, consultants, vendors, retained Experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staff).

2.10 Producing Party: A Party or Non-Party that produces Discovery Material in this action.

2.11 Protected Material: Any Discovery Material that is designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only.”

2.12 Receiving Party: A Party that receives Discovery Material from a Producing Party.

3. PROTECTED MATERIAL

3.1 “CONFIDENTIAL” Material: Documents and tangible things that may be produced or otherwise exchanged that 1) the Designating Party reasonably believes contain, describe, or disclose sensitive, non-public, confidential information, such as (a) court records, whether in this District or other courts, currently maintained under seal; (b) information subject to a non-disclosure or confidentiality agreement; (c) employee personnel information; (d) a NonParty’s commercially sensitive information, trade secrets, or competitive or strategic initiatives that are not readily ascertainable and for which the Designating Party has taken reasonable steps to maintain confidentiality; and (e) personal identifying information subject to redaction under Local Rule 5.2, or 2) the Designating Party’s own commercially sensitive information, such as (a) financial or accounting information; (b) commercially sensitive internal communications or information; and (c) business negotiations, transactions, and dealings with Non-Parties.

3.2 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Material: Extremely sensitive materials that qualify as “CONFIDENTIAL” and that the Designating Party reasonably believes contain highly sensitive business or personal information, the disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party would create a risk of competitive or commercial disadvantage to the Designating Party.

3.3 This Order does not envision the production of source code or object code. Should the Parties agree to source code discovery, or be ordered to produce such discovery, they will enter a separate stipulated source code supplement to this Order.

4. SCOPE

The protections conferred by this agreement cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel, Non-Parties, and/or Experts that might reveal Protected Material.

However, the protections conferred by this agreement do not cover information that is in the public domain or becomes part of the public domain through trial or otherwise.

5. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

5.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Discovery Material that is disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Apart from disclosures to the Producing Party and its current employees and agents, which nothing in this Protective Order prohibits, Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this agreement. Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, for purposes of this Section 5 of the Protective Order, Protected Material can be accessed from a physical location outside of the United States so long as the Protected Material is maintained on a server within the United States and in no way leaves the server within the United States (i.e., Protected Material must be accessed view-only, and cannot be downloaded, photographed, printed, or accessed in any other manner that would cause it to physically or electronically leave the United States server).

5.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Material. A Producing Party may designate Discovery Material as “CONFIDENTIAL” if it contains or reflects confidential, proprietary, and/or commercially sensitive information. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any Confidential Material only to:

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record, as well as employees of Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation;

(b) Experts and their staff to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), such expert or consultant is not a current officer, director, or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party, nor anticipated at the time of retention to become an officer, director or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party. Such expert or consultant accesses the materials in the United States only, and does not transport them to or access them from any foreign jurisdiction, except though the method described in 5.1;

(c) the court, court personnel, and court reporters and their staff;

(d) copy, imaging, document management, and electronic discovery services retained by Counsel to assist in the management of Confidential Material and who execute the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” attached as Exhibit A, provided that counsel for the Party retaining such services instructs the service not to disclose any Confidential Material to third parties and to immediately return all originals and copies of any Confidential Material;

(e) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Confidential Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this agreement;

(f) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.

(g) graphics, translation, design, and/or trial consulting personnel, having first agreed to be bound by the provisions of the Protective Order by signing a copy of Exhibit A;

(h) mock jurors who have signed an undertaking or agreement agreeing not to publicly disclose Protected Material and to keep any information concerning Protected Material confidential;

(i) any mediator who is assigned to hear this matter, and his or her staff, subject to their agreement to maintain confidentiality to the same degree as required by this Protective Order;

(j) to assist in the defense of this litigation, in-house counsel and non-attorney staff who assist them, including paralegals, economists, and support staff, who are not responsible for competitive decision making; and

(k) any other person who has agreed to be bound by the provisions of the Protective Order by signing a copy of Exhibit A with the prior written consent of the Producing Party, and on such conditions as may be agreed or ordered, but such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, or upon order of the Court.

5.3 Disclosure of “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Material. A Producing Party may designate Discovery Material as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” if it contains or reflects information that is extremely confidential and/or sensitive in nature and the Producing Party reasonably believes that the disclosure of such Discovery Material is likely to cause economic harm or significant competitive disadvantage to the Producing Party. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any Highly Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes Only Material only to:

(a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, as well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation;

(b) Experts, professional jury or trial consultants, and their employees and staff, to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); such expert or consultant is not a current officer, director, or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party, nor anticipated at the time of retention to become an officer, director, or employee of a Party or of a competitor of a Party; such expert or consultant is not involved in competitive decision-making, as defined by U.S. Steel v. United States, 730 F.2d 1465, 1468 n.3 (Fed. Cir. 1984), on behalf of a Party or a competitor of a Party; and such expert or consultant accesses the materials in the United States only, and does not transport them to or access them from any foreign jurisdiction, except though the method described in 5.1;

(c) the court, court personnel, jury, and court reporters and their staff;

(d) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information;

(e) copy, imaging, document management, and electronic discovery services retained by Counsel to assist in the management of Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only Material and who execute the “Agreement to Be Bound by Protective Order” attached as Exhibit A, provided that counsel for the Party retaining such services instructs the service not to disclose any Highly Confidential Material to third parties and to immediately return all originals and copies of any Confidential Material;

(f) graphics, translation, design, and/or trial consulting personnel, having first agreed to be bound by the provisions of the Protective Order by signing a copy of Exhibit A;

(g) any mediator who is assigned to hear this matter, and his or her staff, subject to their agreement to maintain confidentiality to the same degree as required by this Protective Order; and

(h) any other person who has agreed to be bound by the provisions of the Protective Order by signing a copy of Exhibit A with the prior written consent of the Producing Party, and on such conditions as may be agreed or ordered, but such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, or upon order of the Court.

5.4 Filing Protected Material. Before filing Protected Material or discussing or referencing such material in court filings, the filing Party shall confer with the Designating Party, in accordance with Local Civil Rule 5(g). Any motion to seal filed by the Receiving Party, where a Designating Party must make the showing required by Local Civil Rule 5(g)(3)(B) in response to the motion, must be noted for consideration no earlier than the fourth Friday after filing. Failure to satisfy these requirements will result in the motion to seal being denied, in accordance with the strong presumption of public access to the Court’s files.

5.5 Disclosure of Protected Material at Hearings or Trial: Any person receiving Protected Material shall not reveal or discuss such information at any pre-trial hearing or hearing open to individuals not otherwise authorized to receive Protected Material except as follows: In the event a person receiving Protected Material intends to use Protected Material in any proceeding open to individuals not entitled to receive Protected Materials, such person shall, at least 14 days in advance, move to seal the proceeding or give the person that produced the Protected Material written notice. In the latter case, the Parties shall thereafter meet and confer to determine whether the Protected Material can be so used. If they cannot reach agreement, the person who produced the Protected Material may file a motion to seal the proceeding. If, however, the party that seeks to use the Protected Material at a hearing for which it had fewer than 21 days’ advance notice, the parties will meet and confer within a reasonable time before the hearing regarding moving to seal.

5.6 Secure Storage, No Export. Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location in the United States and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order. To ensure compliance with applicable United States Export Administration Regulations, Protected Material may not be exported outside the United States or released to any foreign national (even if within the United States).

5.7 Legal Advice Based on Protected Material. Nothing in this Protective Order shall be construed to prevent Outside Counsel from advising their clients with respect to this case based in whole or in part upon Protected Materials, provided Outside Counsel does not disclose the Protected Material itself except as provided in this Order.

5.8 Limitations. Nothing in this Order shall restrict in any way a Producing Party’s use or disclosure of its own Protected Material. Nothing in this Order shall restrict in any way the use or disclosure of Discovery Material by a Receiving Party: (i) that is or has become publicly known through no fault of the Receiving Party; (ii) that is lawfully acquired by or known to the Receiving Party independent of the Producing Party; (iii) previously produced, disclosed and/or provided by the Producing Party to the Receiving Party or a non-party without an obligation of confidentiality and not by inadvertence or mistake; (iv) with the consent of the Producing Party; or (v) pursuant to order of the Court.

6. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL

6.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this agreement must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify, so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this agreement.

Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber or delay the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions.

If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection, the Designating Party must promptly notify all other parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.

6.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as provided in section 6.2 (a) below, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this agreement must be clearly so designated before or when the material is disclosed or produced. In the event that original documents are produced for inspection, the original documents shall be presumed “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” during the inspection and re-designated, as appropriate during the copying process.

(a) Information in documentary form: (e.g., paper or electronic documents and deposition exhibits, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), the Designating Party must affix the word(s) “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” to each page that contains Protected Material. With respect to documents containing Protected Material produced in native format, the Designating Party shall include the appropriate designation at the end of the filename for each document. When native electronic files or documents are printed for use at deposition, in a court proceeding, or for provision in printed form to an expert or consultant, the party printing the electronic files or documents shall affix a legend to the printed document corresponding to the designation of the Producing Party and including the production number and designation associated with the native file. If a Party uses at a deposition a .tiff, .pdf, or other image format version of a native document, that Party shall, upon request, provide a copy of the native file to counsel for the witness and all Parties in attendance who are entitled to review the document pursuant to this Protective Order.

(b) Testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial proceedings: The Parties and any participating Non-Parties must identify on the record, during the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony, without prejudice to their right to so designate other testimony after reviewing the transcript. Any Party or Non-Party may, within 30 days after receiving the transcript of the deposition or other pretrial proceeding, designate portions of the transcript, or exhibits thereto, as confidential. Transcripts containing Protected Material shall have an obvious legend on the title page that the transcript contains Protected Material and the title page shall be followed by a list of all pages (including line numbers as appropriate) that have been designated as Protected Material and the level of protection being asserted by the Designating Party. The Designating Party shall inform the court reporter of these requirements. Until the expiration of the 30-day period for designation, any deposition transcript shall be treated as if it had been designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY” in its entirety, unless otherwise agreed. However, upon a showing of good cause by the Party seeking to rely on the transcript, e.g., for use in a scheduled filing with the Court, the Parties may mutually agree to shorten the designation period. Any Party that wishes to disclose the transcript, or information contained therein prior to the end of the 30-day period, may provide written notice of its intent to treat the transcript as non-confidential, after which time, any Party that wants to maintain any portion of the transcript as confidential must designate the confidential portions within fourteen (14) days, or else the transcript may be treated as nonconfidential. Any Protected Material that is used in the taking of a deposition shall remain subject to the provisions of this Protective Order, along with the transcript pages of the deposition testimony dealing with such Protected Material.

Counsel for any Producing Party shall have the right to exclude from oral depositions, other than the deponent, deponent’s counsel, the reporter and videographer (if any), any person who is not authorized by this Protective Order to receive or access Protected Material based on the designation of such Protected Material. Such right of exclusion shall be applicable only during periods of examination or testimony regarding such Protected Material.

If a Party or Non-Party desires to protect confidential information at trial, the issue should be addressed during the pre-trial conference.

(c) Other tangible items: The Producing Party must affix in a prominent place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information or item is stored the words “CONFIDENTIAL ” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.” If only a portion or portions of the information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s).

6.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this agreement for such material. The Producing Party must notify all Receiving Parties that such Discovery Material is protected under one of the categories of this Order within fourteen (14) days of the Producing Party learning of the inadvertent failure to designate. The Producing Party shall reproduce the Protected Material with the correct confidentiality designation within seven (7) days upon its notification to the Receiving Parties. Designations of protected materials that take place after initial production shall be subject to the same procedure and scrutiny applied to all other protective designations contemplated in this agreement. Upon receiving the Protected Material with the correct confidentiality designation, the Receiving Parties shall return or securely destroy, at the Producing Party’s option, all Discovery Material that was not designated properly.

7. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS

7.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a Designating Party’s confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or a significant disruption or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed. Any challenge to a designation of Discovery Material under this Order shall be written, shall be served on outside counsel for the Producing Party, shall particularly identify the documents or information that the Receiving Party contends should be differently designated, and shall state the grounds for the objection.

7.2 Meet and Confer. The Parties must make every attempt to resolve any dispute regarding confidential designations without court involvement. The Producing Party shall have the burden of justifying the disputed designation. Any motion regarding confidential designations or for a protective order must include a certification, in the motion or in a declaration or affidavit, that the movant has engaged in a good faith meet and confer conference with other affected Parties in an effort to resolve the dispute without court action. The certification must list the date, manner, and participants to the conference. A good faith effort to confer requires a face-to-face meeting or a telephone conference.

7.3 Judicial Intervention. If the Parties cannot resolve a challenge without court intervention, the Designating Party may file and serve a motion to retain confidentiality under Local Civil Rule 7 (and in compliance with Local Civil Rule 5(g), if applicable), or may request that the parties follow the expedited joint motion procedure set forth in Local Civil Rule 37(a)(2). The burden of persuasion in any such motion shall be on the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the challenging Party to sanctions. All Parties shall continue to maintain the material in question as confidential until the court rules on the challenge.

8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION

If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY,” that Party must:

(a) promptly notify the Designating Party in writing and include a copy of the subpoena or court order;

(b) promptly notify in writing the Party who caused the subpoena or order to issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order is subject to this agreement. Such notification shall include a copy of this agreement; and

(c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected.

If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order from the court from which the subpoena or order issued, the Party served with the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” before a determination by the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court of its Protected Material, and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this action to disobey a lawful directive from another court.

9. DATA SECURITY

(1) Receiving Party shall in good faith implement an information security management system (“ISMS”) to safeguard Protected Materials, including reasonable and appropriate administrative, physical, and technical safeguards, and network security and encryption technologies governed by written policies and procedures, which shall comply with at least one of the then-current versions of the following standards: (a) the International Organization for Standardization’s 27001 standard; (b) the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST) 800-53 standard; (c) the Center for Internet Security’s Critical Security Controls; or (d) the most recently published version of another widely recognized industry or government cybersecurity framework. The Parties shall implement multi-factor authentication[1] for any access to Protected Materials. By way of example only, the minimum multi-factor authentication factor required by this Section 9(1) of the Protective Order is to register a user’s computer as a trusted device, after which that user can access Protected Material with their regular system username and password. Additionally, each Party shall implement encryption of all Protected Materials in transit outside of network(s) covered by the Party’s ISMS (except as necessary to submit documents to the court), and at rest, where reasonably practical. A Party may satisfy this encryption requirement by, for example, using mandatory transport layer security (“TLS”) encryption provided by an email service.

(2) If Receiving Party becomes aware of any unauthorized access, use, or disclosure of Protected Materials or devices containing Protected Materials, Receiving Party shall comply with all requirements of Section 10 of this Protective Order. Additionally, if Receiving Party becomes aware of any cyberattack or other deliberate security breach resulting in actual or potential unauthorized access to Protected Materials (including as a result of or following an inadvertent disclosure addressed by Section 10 below) (“Data Breach”), Receiving Party shall also promptly, and in no case later than 48 hours after learning of the Data Breach, notify Producing Party in writing and fully cooperate with Producing Party as may be reasonably necessary to (a) determine the source, extent, or methodology of such Data Breach, (b) to recover or to protect Protected Materials, (c) to satisfy Producing Party’s legal, contractual, or other obligations, and/or (d) share, within 10 business days, the relevant ISMS policies and procedures that relate to the safeguarding of Protected Materials and that preceded the Data breach, in writing or otherwise. For the avoidance of doubt, notification obligations under this Section arise when the Receiving Party both (a) learns of a Data Breach, and (b) learns that any of the Producing Party’s Protected Materials are potentially subject to the Data Breach. The notification obligations set forth in this Section do not run from the time the Data Breach itself;

(3) Receiving Party shall promptly comply with Producing Party’s reasonable request(s) that Receiving Party investigate, remediate, and mitigate the effects of a Data Breach and any potential recurrence and take all reasonable steps to terminate and prevent unauthorized access. Receiving Party shall promptly provide any information that is reasonably requested by Producing Party and that relates to any such Data Breach, including but not limited to, the Protected Material that was potentially impacted, the manner in which the Data Breach occurred, start or end date of the Data Breach, date of discovery, and specific actions taken to contain, mitigate, or remediate the Data Breach. For the avoidance of doubt, nothing in this Section 9 is intended to create a waiver of any applicable privileges, including privileges applicable to a Party’s investigation and remediation of a Data Breach;

(4) If Receiving Party is aware of a Data Breach, the Parties shall meet and confer in good faith regarding any adjustments that should be made to the discovery process and discovery schedule in this action, potentially including but not limited to (1) additional security measures to protect Discovery Material; (2) a stay or extension of discovery pending investigation of a Data Breach and/or implementation of additional security measures; and (3) a sworn assurance that Discovery Materials will be handled in the future only by entities not impacted by the Data Breach. Further, the Receiving Party shall submit to reasonable discovery concerning the Data Breach;

(6) Receiving Party shall comply with this Section 9 and any applicable security, privacy, data protection, or breach notification laws, rules, regulations, or directives (“Applicable Data Law”). If Receiving Party is uncertain whether a particular practice would conform with the requirements of this Section 9, it may meet and confer with the other Parties; if any Party believes that the proposed practice would violate this Protective Order, it may, within 10 business days, bring the dispute to the Court. The Party challenging the proposed practice would bear the burden of demonstrating a violation.\

10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL

If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this agreement, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized access or disclosure, (b) investigate and report to Designating Party the scope of and circumstances of the unauthorized access or disclosure; (c) take immediate and reasonable steps to rectify the unauthorized access or disclosure, including using its best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material and instituting additional security to prevent any further access or disclosure, (d) comply with all obligations under applicable laws relating to unauthorized access or disclosure, including security breach notification laws and other applicable laws, (e) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and (f) request that such person or persons execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

11. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED MATERIAL

When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order or agreement that provides for production without prior privilege review. This Order invokes the protections afforded by Fed. R. Evid. 502(b). As provided under Fed. R. Evid. 502(b) and 502(d) and subject to the limitations in Fed. R. Evid. 502(a), the disclosure of privileged material in connection with this litigation does not operate as a waiver in this action or any other action by the Producing Party of any privilege applicable to those documents, including the attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product protection, or any other privilege or protection recognized by law.

Upon a request from any Producing Party who has inadvertently produced Discovery Material that it believes is privileged and/or protected, each Receiving Party shall immediately return such Protected Material or Discovery Material and all copies to the Producing Party, except for any pages containing privileged markings by the Receiving Party which shall instead be destroyed and certified as such by the Receiving Party to the Producing Party.

Nothing herein shall prevent the Receiving Party from preparing a record for its own use containing the date, author, addresses, and topic of the inadvertently produced Discovery Material and such other information as is reasonably necessary to identify the Discovery Material and describe its nature to the Court in any motion to compel production of the Discovery Material.

In the event of a disclosure of any Discovery Material pursuant to this Order to any person or persons not authorized to receive such disclosure under this Protective Order, the Party responsible for having made such disclosure, and each Party with knowledge thereof, shall immediately notify counsel for the Producing Party whose Discovery Material has been disclosed and provide to such counsel all known relevant information concerning the nature and circumstances of the disclosure. The responsible disclosing Party shall also promptly take all reasonable measures to retrieve the improperly disclosed Discovery Material and to ensure that no further or greater unauthorized disclosure and/or use thereof is made.

12. NON -TERMINATION AND RETURN OF DOCUMENTS

Within 90 days after the termination of this action, including all appeals, each Receiving Party must destroy all Protected Material, including all copies, extracts and summaries thereof.

The Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 90-day deadline that affirms that the Receiving Party has used reasonable efforts to destroy copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material.

Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain one archival copy of all documents filed with the court, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Counsel may not retain copies of document productions. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Stipulated Protective Order.

Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this agreement shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court orders otherwise.

13. DISCOVERY FROM EXPERTS OR CONSULTANTS

Absent good cause, drafts of reports of testifying experts, and reports and other written materials, including drafts, of consulting experts, shall not be discoverable.

Reports and materials exempt from discovery under the foregoing Paragraph shall be treated as attorney work product for the purposes of this case and Protective Order.

14. MISCELLANEOUS

(a) Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. By stipulating to this Order, the Parties do not waive the right to argue that certain material may require additional or different confidentiality protections than those set forth herein.

(b) Termination of Matter and Retention of Jurisdiction. The Parties agree that the terms of this Protective Order shall survive and remain in effect after the Final Determination of the above-captioned matter. The Court shall retain jurisdiction after Final Determination of this matter to hear and resolve any disputes arising out of this Protective Order.

(c) Successors. This Order shall be binding upon the Parties hereto, their attorneys, and their successors, executors, personal representatives, administrators, heirs, legal representatives, assigns, subsidiaries, divisions, employees, agents, retained consultants and experts, and any persons or organizations over which they have direct control.

(d) Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective Order, no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any information or item. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order. This Order shall not constitute a waiver of the right of any Party to claim in this action or otherwise that any Discovery Material, or any portion thereof, is privileged or otherwise non-discoverable, or is not admissible in evidence in this action or any other proceeding.

(e) Burdens of Proof. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary above, nothing in this Protective Order shall be construed to change the burdens of proof or legal standards applicable in disputes regarding whether particular Discovery Material is confidential, which level of confidentiality is appropriate, whether disclosure should be restricted, and if so, what restrictions should apply.

(f) Modification by Court. This Order is subject to further court order based upon public policy or other considerations, and the Court may modify this Order sua sponte in the interests of justice. The Western District of Washington is responsible for the interpretation and enforcement of this Order. All disputes concerning Protected Material, however designated, produced under the protection of this Order shall be resolved by the Western District of Washington.

(g) Discovery Rules Remain Unchanged. Nothing herein shall alter or change in any way the discovery provisions of the Western District of Washington, or the Court’s own orders. Identification of any individual pursuant to this Protective Order does not make that individual available for deposition or any other form of discovery outside of the restrictions and procedures of the Western District of Washington, or the Court’s own orders.

DATED December 6, 2023.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 15th day of December, 2023.

EXHIBIT A

ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND

I, ____________________________________ [print or type full name], of ____________________________________ [print or type full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington on [date] in the case of Floyd v. Amazon.com, Inc. and Apple Inc., Case No. 2:22-cv-01599-JCC. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order.

I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action.

Date:

City and State where sworn and signed:

Printed name:

Signature:

Footnotes

Multi-factor authentication is “[a]uthentication using two or more factors to achieve authentication. Factors are (i) something you know (e.g., password/personal identification number); (ii) something you have (e.g., cryptographic identification device, token); and (iii) something you are (e.g., biometric).” National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Special Publication SP 1800-12, Appendix B at 63, available at https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/ NIST.SP.1800-12.pdf; see also NIST, Special Publication 800-53, at 132, available at https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-53r5.pdf