The standards governing privilege review for this multi-district litigation have been set forth in multiple orders of Magistrate Judge Cisneros. See Dkts. 1908, 2005, 2168.

Pursuant to Master Order No. 3, Uber produced 160 documents associated with custodians Mat Henley, Danielle Sheridan, Frank Chang, Bushara Faiz, and Sachin Kansal for in camera review. The Master determined that 150 of the documents were privileged in whole or in part and eight were not privileged. The Master also ordered Uber to provide additional information regarding two of the documents.

Following the submission of additional information and further in camera review, the Master determined that 152 of the documents associated with custodians Mat Henley, Danielle Sheridan, Frank Chang, Bushara Faiz, and Sachin Kansal are privileged in whole or in part and six are not privileged. The privilege claims for two documents were withdrawn in part by Uber and there were no further challenges by plaintiffs.[1] 

Footnotes