Kim, Sallie, United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiffs,
v.
APPLE, INC.,
Defendant
ORDER ON PENDING DISCOVERY DISPUTES Regarding Docket No. 138, 141, 171-3
Now before the Court are several pending discovery disputes. The Court will address the
outstanding motions to seal in a separate Order. The parties’ pending disputes are as follows:
(1) a dispute concerning Plaintiffs’ First Set of Requests for Production (“RFPs”), dated on February 18, 2022, and Apple’s response thereto and Plaintiffs’ First Set of Interrogatories dated September 15, 2022, and Apple’s response thereto; (Dkt. No. 138), which was addressed in a larger discussion about sampling proposals (Dkt. Nos. 197, 198);
(2) a second dispute concerning Plaintiffs’ Requests for Production dated on February 18, 2022, and Apple’s response thereto, but focusing on Request for Production No. 3; (Dkt. No. 141); and
(3) a dispute concerning: (a) Plaintiffs’ request for more than 10 depositions; (b) the scope of Plaintiffs’ Rule 30(b)(6) Topic 11 regarding Siri budget documents; (c) Apple’s response to Plaintiffs Request for Production Set One, Nos. 6 and 22; and (d) Apple’s response to Plaintiffs’ Interrogatory No. 23 relating to the scope of Apple’s data collection. (Dkt. No. 171-3.)[1]
Having considered the parties’ written submissions and considered arguments raised at the hearing of January 19, 2024, the Court rules as follows:
(1) The Court adopts the sampling proposal proposed by Apple. (Dkt. No. 197-1.)
(2) The Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion to compel further documents in response to Request for Production No. 3.
(3) The Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ request for more than 10 depositions. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion to compel the Rule 30(b)(6) Topic 11 regarding Siri budget documents. The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion to compel Apple’s responses to Interrogatory No. 23 relating to the scope of Apple’s data collection.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Footnotes